As I have heard people did not trust Euler when he first discovered the formula (solution of the Basel problem)
However, Euler was Euler and he gave other proofs.
I believe many of you know some nice proofs of this, can you please share it with us?
What's this page about? ➤
Temml is a fork of KaTeX by Ron Kok. It produces good looking math on HTML pages via the use of MathML. It's fast because it just produces MathML <math>
tags and doesn't have the overhead of creating and displaying HTML math (like KaTeX does).
This long page from Stackexchange has over 630 equations and we've used Temml to convert the LaTeX equations to math expressions. You can see 3 different approaches to speeding up the user experience, where each one uses Temml processing.
Each version looks almost identical, but there are big differences in page load, due to the initial number of DOM elements and subsequent bandwidth involved.
Briefly, the 3 versions work as follows:
You can follow along in the console to get a better idea what's happening.
See: SVGMath Explanation and Stats for further details and comparisons with SVGMath, MathJax, and KaTEX.
NOTE: By default, Temml (like KaTeX) does not handle wide equations (particularly if they're in display mode) well on a phone. Temml just hides the overflow, so on this page, I implemented a horizontal scrollbar method to handle this.
On with the demo.
[DEMO starts]
As I have heard people did not trust Euler when he first discovered the formula (solution of the Basel problem)
However, Euler was Euler and he gave other proofs.
I believe many of you know some nice proofs of this, can you please share it with us?
OK, here's my favorite. I thought of this after reading a proof from the book "Proofs from the book" by Aigner & Ziegler, but later I found more or less the same proof as mine in a paper published a few years earlier by Josef Hofbauer. On Robin's list, the proof most similar to this is number 9 (EDIT: ...which is actually the proof that I read in Aigner & Ziegler).
When we have and thus Note that . Split the interval into equal parts, and sum the inequality over the (inner) "gridpoints" : Denoting the sum on the right-hand side by , we can write this as
Although looks like a complicated sum, it can actually be computed fairly easily. To begin with,
Therefore, if we pair up the terms in the sum except the midpoint (take the point in the left half of the interval together with the point in the right half) we get 4 times a sum of the same form, but taking twice as big steps so that we only sum over every other gridpoint; that is, over those gridpoints that correspond to splitting the interval into parts. And the midpoint contributes with to the sum. In short, Since , the solution of this recurrence is (For example like this: the particular (constant) solution plus the general solution to the homogeneous equation , with the constant determined by the initial condition .)
We now have Multiply by and let . This squeezes the partial sums between two sequences both tending to . Voilà!
top